Medicare

Alex Hogan's picture

New Health Care Coalition Calls on Lawmakers Not to Ignore Retiree Health Care

As members of Congress return to Washington, D.C. to address health care reform, a new alliance of businesses and labor unions is reminding policy makers not to forget the health care needs of a key segment of the population: Americans aged 55-64.

more »

Medicare Advantage Organizations: Actual Expenses and Profits Compared to Projections for 2006

Insurers pocket an extra $1.33 billion in profits previously projected to go to health benefits

House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee Chairman Pete Stark (D-CA) today released a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) showing that private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans spent less on health care services than they projected in 2006. As a result, private plans pocketed an extra $1.33 billion in profits – 65 percent more than estimated in their 2006 bids. This is the second year in a row that MA organization profits exceeded their own projections. A June GAO report showed that in 2005, MA plans earned an extra $1.14 billion in profit. more »

The Facts


Medicare proves the success of progressive health care policy. Before Medicare, approximately half of America’s seniors lacked health insurance; today, virtually everyone over age 65 is covered by Medicare. [Kaiser Family Foundation] Because Medicare is a health-care-for-all plan for the elderly, it allows the government to pool risk and lower costs. As a result, Medicare beneficiaries report a high level of satisfaction with the program. [Johns Hopkins Medicine]

Conservatives are wrong about the challenges facing Medicare. Conservatives argue that rising enrollment in Medicare is driving up costs. However, the Congressional Budget Office has reported that “the aging of the population…accounts for only a modest fraction of the growth” in Medicare costs. The main factor is the growth of health care costs—the extent to which the increase in health care costs has exceeded the growth of the economy. [CBO] In fact, health expenditures as a percent of GDP have more than doubled since 1970, growing from 7.0 percent to 14.8 percent in 2002. [CBO] So the solution is not to cut benefits or recipients but to hold down health care costs.

Conservative attempts to privatize Medicare have been disastrous. President Bush’s Medicare prescription drug plan forced seniors to deal with hundreds of private insurers and prohibited the government from negotiating lower drug prices. The plan’s “doughnut hole” saddled 3.4 million Medicare beneficiaries with high drug costs. [Kaiser Family Foundation] Its prohibition on drug-price negotiation costs the government an estimated $90 billion annually. [Center for Economic and Policy Research] In addition, costs in the Bush Administration’s privatized “Medicare Advantage” plans are rising twice as fast as costs in traditional Medicare, according to the Government Accountability Office, the Congressional Budget Office, and the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. [Congressional Quarterly] Essentially, we are subsidizing insurance companies to help them compete against Medicare. Health care privatization simply doesn’t work.

Conservatives promise more attacks on Medicare. John McCain’s health care plan calls for almost $900 billion is cuts to Medicare over 10 years, an amount that roughly equals the program’s entire budget for nursing home care. [Center for American Progress] McCain’s cuts would require reductions in benefits, an increase in the Medicare eligibility age, or both, and would lead to higher costs for private insurance as well.

The Argument


Conservative health care “solutions” don’t solve anything. The Bush Administration’s efforts to privatize parts of Medicare have made the system sicker. Only progressive reforms will ensure quality, affordable health care for all.

To protect health care coverage for all Americans, we must protect Medicare. Because it accounts for 17 percent of America’s health care expenditures, changes to Medicare have widespread impact. [Congressional Budget Office] It’s time to strengthen the program, not privatize, outsource, or cut it.

To reduce the increase in health care costs, we need basic reform. Cut the money that insurance companies waste on avoiding insuring those who get sick. Focus on strategies that insurance companies ignore, such as preventive care, promoting exercise and healthy eating habits, and computerized records. Building a healthier America will reduce expenditures on treating illness.

Progressive Solutions


Guarantee quality affordable health care for all. Health coverage must be affordable, with premiums and out-of-pocket costs based on a family’s ability to pay. Progressive health care emphasizes consumer choice, affordability, and quality. Individuals could keep the coverage they have now, or could choose a public plan, or one of an array of private plans. Employers would be expected to cover their employees or pay into a fund for the public plan.

Join the fight. The Institute for America’s Future is a member of Health Care for America Now, the nationwide campaign for health care for all. IAF’s “op-ad” invites everyone to join the campaign. Help challenge the misguided power of the insurance and pharmaceutical industries. Help build a people’s movement to shape a health care system that works for all of us.

Armand Biroonak's picture

Rising Health Care Costs are to Blame for Rising Medicare Cost

The Congressional Budget Office reports the main factor in the rising cost of Medicare is the growth of health care costs—health expenditures as a percent of GDP have more than doubled since 1970, growing from 7.0 percent to 14.8 percent in 2002.

Source
Armand Biroonak's picture

Bush's Medicare Drug Plan Leaves Millions Paying Higher

President Bush’s push for further privatization of Medicare's prescription drug plan stuck 3.4 million Medicare beneficiaries with high drug costs.

Source
Armand Biroonak's picture

Prohibition to Drug-Price Negotiate Costs Government Billions

Bush's Medicare prescription drug plan prohibits the federal government's ability to negotiate drug prices--costing the government an estimated $90 billion annually.

Source
Armand Biroonak's picture

Bush Administration's Medicare Advantage Plan Costs Double

The Bush Administration’s privatized “Medicare Advantage” plans are rising twice as fast as costs in traditional Medicare, according to the Government Accountability Office, the Congressional Budget Office, and the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.

Source

Negotiate Prescription Drug Prices

drugs.jpgWith prices for some prescription drugs increasing over 100 percent in just one year, it's time to renew the fight to give Medicare the power to power to negotiate lower drug prices for seniors in its Part D program. An overwhelming majority of Americans want this, but President Bush, Sen. John McCain and congressional conservatives still won't support this commonsense reform. It's time to call them on it. Here's how.
Armand Biroonak's picture

Price Negotiations Can Save Medicare Billions

If Medicare were allowed to negotiate drug prices with manufacturers, the program would save approximately $90 billion a year, which could be passed along to the elderly in the form of lower costs or greater benefits.

Source

Isaiah J. Poole's picture

Obstruction Boosts Insurance Fat Cats

Senate conservatives went into their customary obstruction mode again late Thursday, choosing to protect the interests of insurance companies while shortchanging the health care needs of older Americans and ignoring the will of the majority. more »

More »»