Sandy Disaster Aid Puts Boehner In A Big Political Bind
October 31, 2012 - 3:48pm ET
Popular This Week
Also Worth Reading
Originally posted at Capital Gains and Games.
You haven't heard much...or perhaps anything...yet about a disaster relief supplemental appropriation for the state and local governments and individuals who were hit so hard by Sandy.
But you will, probably starting this afternoon when President Obama tours New Jersey arm-in-arm with Governor Chris Christie.
My guess is that the disaster relief package will jump the fiscal cliff as a priority immediately after the election and that it will be dealt with weeks before the fiscal cliff deadlines at the start of January.
There are three questions.
First, how much aid will be needed and what will it be used for? The state and local governments that were in Sandy's path have huge infrastructure problems and the individuals who have been affected will look to Washington for assistance in rebuilding.
Second, congressional Republicans demand reductions in other spending to offset the impact of the new Sandy-related aid? No matter what the disaster, that's been the pattern the past two years and it is hard to see it changing for a storm that ravaged primarily blue states.
Third, how will House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) deal with this situation? If the tea party wing of the GOP opposes the aid without offsets, Boehner will be forced to chose between supporting a package that will be extremely important to a large number of states -- including his own -- or opposing the package without spending cuts to boost his chances of being reelected speaker. As I've said before, Boehner very likely needs the support of the tea party wing of the GOP to get reelected speaker and alienating it with support for more spending before the House Republican caucus holds its leadership elections for next year makes this a very difficult political problem for him.
We welcome your comments. Please keep them civil and relevant to the post you're commenting on. We reserve the right to remove comments that are objectionable, anonymous or are otherwise in violation of our terms of use.
Views expressed on this page are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Campaign
for America's Future or Institute for America's Future



Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
